Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing serious allegations of genocide in Gaza, referencing opinions from Holocaust and genocide scholars. It aims to provoke thought and discussion on the application of 'Never Again' beyond Jewish experiences, suggesting a broader moral and legal responsibility.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by making strong accusations that may inflame tensions, but it also seeks to highlight potential human rights violations. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of genocide survivors by referencing their expertise, but the strong language could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by bringing expert opinions into the discussion, though it may polarize opinions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in dialogue by presenting expert views, but the accusatory tone may hinder constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.