Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and discusses ceasefire negotiations and accusations of genocide. It presents a perspective on the actions of Hamas and Israel, suggesting that Israel is blocking peace efforts.
- The statement uses charged language, such as 'genocide,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone towards Israel could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others involved in the conflict. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a one-sided view and uses inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation against Israel without acknowledging the complexity of the situation or the perspectives of all parties involved. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the charged language and one-sided perspective. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.