The statement challenges widely accepted scientific views on climate change and sea level rise, suggesting a new study contradicts these views. It uses strong language, calling the situation a 'massive scientific scandal,' which may provoke controversy.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading misinformation if the study is not widely accepted or peer-reviewed. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses established scientific consensus without detailed explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses dismissive language rather than encouraging discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.