The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a significant and contentious international issue, specifically the classification of actions in Gaza as genocide. It reflects a strong opinion aligned with a scholarly resolution, potentially influencing public perception and policy discussions.
- The statement could contribute to harm by escalating tensions and polarizing opinions, though it aligns with a scholarly resolution. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It may not fully respect the dignity of all parties involved, as it makes a definitive claim about a complex issue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without encouraging dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.