Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -94
9/3/2025, 1:04:14 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
@MeghanEMurphy Such bullying was required to get away with their complete horror show of medical atrocities — worse than any Cronenberg film — against children and the mentally ill:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
700d
THE WPATH FILES

Advocates of gender-affirming care say it’s evidence-based.

But now, newly released internal files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical.

American
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
In 2019, Twitter banned @MeghanEMurphy for saying, "Men aren't women."

It's will never cease to be amazing how a small group of highly aggressive and pathological people bullied all of high liberal society into denying basic biology.
Meghan Murphy
@MeghanEMurphy
·
1169d
Men aren't women, tho @vijaya
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
152d
Like him or not, Malcolm Gladwell is one of the most influential and financially successful journalists of the last 30 years. For him to say he was too scared to say men don’t belong in girls sports shows both how totalitarian the MSM is and how chicken shit MSM journalists are.
Benjamin Ryan
@benryanwriter
·
153d
Malcom Gladwell says he is “ashamed” of having said in a previous panel discussion that trans women have a place in women’s sports. He says he was “cowed” into saying so.

“Trans athletes have no place in the female category,” he says.

The statement is a strong critique of gender-affirming medical practices, using charged language like 'medical atrocities' and 'absolute predators.' It expresses a clear opposition to these practices, framing them as harmful and shameful. The tone is accusatory and alarmist, aiming to provoke a strong emotional response.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses inflammatory language that could contribute to harm, particularly towards those involved in or supportive of gender-affirming care. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The language used could be seen as disrespectful and stigmatizing towards individuals who are transgender or support gender-affirming care. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using divisive and accusatory language. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and strong accusations. [-2]