Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques the French government's approach to online speech, suggesting a historical pattern of censorship. It implies that recent political events have influenced a crackdown on free speech, framing it as a response by elites to control information.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by framing actions as a crackdown, which might incite fear or distrust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as disrespecting the dignity of those involved by labeling them as 'elites.' [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on negative aspects without offering solutions. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to critique government actions, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   It upholds free speech by discussing censorship but does so in a way that might not be entirely responsible or balanced. [+1]