Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the release of documents, suggesting that the volume is misleading due to duplication, and implies a lack of transparency or manipulation in the process. It engages with public issues related to transparency and accountability in document releases.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of the document release process.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize the actions of those responsible for the document release.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the process. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to question transparency, which is a responsible use of public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.