Robert Costa

The statement addresses a public issue concerning the integrity and independence of public health recommendations, which is a matter of public concern. It implies potential political interference in health policy, which is a significant public discourse topic.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about potential harm from political interference in health recommendations.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and their professional actions. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a potential issue of public interest, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents a factual account of events. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no indication of acknowledgment or correction of mistakes within the statement itself.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to bring attention to a significant public health issue, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using a platform to discuss a public issue. [+2]