Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on a public issue involving a nominee for a government position and their past behavior on social media, which is relevant to public discourse as it pertains to the suitability of a public official.
- The statement highlights harmful behavior by the nominee, which violates the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The nominee's past actions, as described, show a lack of respect for the privacy and dignity of others, engaging in cyberbullying and hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The nominee's actions, as reported, do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement itself does not engage in personal attacks but reports on the nominee's past behavior, which involved personal attacks and ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The report uses its platform to inform the public about the nominee's past behavior, which is relevant for societal betterment by ensuring informed decision-making. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The report upholds free speech by responsibly using its platform to inform the public about relevant issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.