In reply to:
Virginie Joron
@v_joron
·
147d
Pascal Clérotte
@McmahonPascal
·
147d
Virginie Joron
@v_joron
·
147d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the blocking of a website by the European Parliament, which is related to allegations of censorship in France. The conversation involves public figures and addresses issues of censorship and transparency, making it part of public discourse.
- The conversation raises concerns about potential censorship, which could be seen as promoting transparency and accountability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for open access to information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussion respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The conversation promotes understanding by discussing the reasons behind the website's blocking and the implications of such actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The dialogue is constructive, seeking explanations and offering to present a report, rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.