In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
146d
The statement and related content engage in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship, free speech, and transparency within the European Parliament. The tone is critical and seeks accountability from public officials.
- The statement aims to hold public officials accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification and transparency regarding the blocking of a website. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of the European Parliament and requesting a reasoned response. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.