Gary Marcus

The statement critiques a previous prediction about AI's role in code generation, providing updated statistics to counter the original claim. It engages in public discourse by addressing the accuracy of technological predictions and their implications.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm and provides factual information to correct a previous prediction. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding by offering updated data and context about AI's role in coding. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the inaccuracy of the prediction without personal attacks. [+1]