Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -105

The statement criticizes actions in Europe as violations of democratic principles and suggests a significant geopolitical response by the US. It raises concerns about censorship and democratic processes, linking them to NATO obligations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived harm to democratic processes, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for democracy. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It seeks to promote understanding of democratic values and the importance of free elections, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion for democratic rights. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of European actions, but it could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue by suggesting ending NATO, which is a drastic measure. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on international relations and democratic values, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]