Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -108

The statement criticizes Gavin Newsom for not implementing a law to address fentanyl drug dealing, suggesting a need for new leadership in California. It engages in public discourse by addressing drug policy and governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by suggesting self-medication, which may be interpreted as endorsing drug use. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but criticizes a public figure's actions, which is a common aspect of political discourse.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of a political figure, but it lacks constructive dialogue and focuses on personal attacks. [-1]