Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -109
9/8/2025, 2:04:54 AM
X
In reply to:
Kathy Moore
@KathyMo75475221
·
140d
@shellenberger @WallStreetApes Did you not get credit for it?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
140d
@WallStreetApes I shot this.
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
·
141d
EXPOSED 🚨 California Democrats are paying people to be homeless

Homeless man moved across country to California to be homeless

“How long you been in San Francisco?”

Homeless man “Since June. If you're gonna be homeless, it's pretty f*cking easy here. I mean, if we're gonna be

The statement 'No he did not' is a brief denial in a conversation about credit for a video related to homelessness in California. The original post discusses a controversial claim about California's policies on homelessness, which is a public issue. However, the specific reply does not engage substantively with the public issue itself, focusing instead on a side conversation about credit for a video.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a conversation that could potentially spread misinformation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is a simple denial without further explanation.