In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
139d
The statement is a direct response to a conversation about freedom of speech and government control, referencing a tragic event in Nepal. It uses a confrontational tone, addressing several political figures and accusing them of attempting to silence people. The statement implies a threat by saying 'We are watching you,' which can be interpreted as aggressive and potentially harmful.
- The statement's confrontational tone and implied threat may cause harm, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By using a potentially threatening tone, the statement may not fully respect the dignity of the individuals addressed. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses an accusatory and aggressive approach. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead opting for a confrontational and accusatory tone. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.