In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
139d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
139d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of mandatory psychiatric care and its opposition by certain groups. It critiques the influence of cultural and intellectual figures and organizations on mental health policies.
- The statement assigns blame to specific groups and individuals, which could be seen as harmful, but it does not use overtly harmful language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement critiques public figures and organizations, which is a common aspect of public discourse, but it should ensure it does not cross into harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on assigning blame rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a constructive dialogue or solutions, focusing instead on blame. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.