In reply to:
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
137d
The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing newly declassified reports that potentially alter the understanding of historical events related to 9/11. The tone is serious and suggests a significant revelation that could impact public perception and historical narratives.
- The statement aims to inform the public about new findings, which could be seen as contributing to public knowledge without direct harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could potentially lead to speculation or misinterpretation, which might affect the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on the revelation of information.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents information that could lead to public debate. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.