Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue regarding the subpoena of financial transactions related to Jeffrey Epstein and the political actions surrounding it. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that Republicans are protecting wrongdoers. This could be seen as an attempt to hold public figures accountable but also risks being inflammatory.
- The statement aims to expose potential wrongdoing, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by seeking transparency. However, the accusatory tone could harm reputations without evidence.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by implying guilt without due process, potentially engaging in harmful rhetoric. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a personal attack, which could hinder productive discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.