Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
9/10/2025, 2:55:57 PM
X
In reply to:
VonPhul
@BaronVonPhul
·
64d
@marwilliamson @Sweetorla Sorry, the race hustle has lost it's wildcard status. We're all over it. You'll have to try something reasoned.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
64d
@Sweetorla You and I are write women, therefore unlikely to be messed with. You think we should be okay with Latino immigrants, etc., simply being picked up off the streets by masked men for no other reason than that the agents want to do it,separated from their families and sent to God
Kate
@Sweetorla
·
64d
@marwilliamson And that’s ok by me.
Just do what the police/ICE tell you to do.
Stop posting crap like this, Marianne.
You are emboldening people to buck up against authorities.
This will only serve to get people hurt. You know this, Marianne. You know this.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
64d
As of now, anyone can be picked up by an Ice agent just because the Ice agent wants to arrest them. No paperwork needed. No real reason other than that they want to. No due process needed.

In practice, we are now a functioning police state.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the existence and impact of bigotry, responding to a conversation about immigration enforcement and racial issues. The tone is confrontational, questioning the dismissal of bigotry as a relevant issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be perceived as dismissive or confrontational. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement challenges the previous comment but does so in a confrontational manner, lacking constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]