Ilhan Omar

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 66
Zeteo
@zeteo_news
·
66d
This is a lie, here’s how @IlhanMN actually reacted with @mehdirhasan to the news of Charlie Kirk’s death in that same interview: with sadness for his wife and kids.
9/11/2025, 8:56:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Daniella Greenbaum Davis
@DGreenbaum
·
66d
@IlhanMN the first sentence you say, in this tweet and everywhere else, should be "my heart breaks for his wife and children." the fact that you need to caveat your sympathy for a man shot in cold blood by reminding people WHO TRUST ME, ALREADY KNOW that you dont like his rhetoric, is
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
66d
While I disagreed with Charlie Kirk vehemently about his rhetoric, my heart breaks for his wife and children. I don’t wish violence on anyone. My faith teaches me the power of peace, empathy, and compassion.

Right-wing accounts trying to spin a false story when I condemned his

The statement and conversation involve a public figure and address a sensitive issue, making it part of public discourse. The discussion revolves around the expression of sympathy and the interpretation of a public figure's comments, which are being contested and potentially misrepresented.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @IlhanMN expresses sympathy, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. However, the misrepresentation by @EndWokeness could cause harm by spreading false information. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The misrepresentation of @IlhanMN's comments by @EndWokeness violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, as it distorts her message and intentions. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    @IlhanMN's original statement promotes empathy and compassion, but the subsequent misrepresentation undermines these values. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation involves disagreement, but the misrepresentation by @EndWokeness does not engage in constructive criticism and instead resorts to personal attacks. [-2]