Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -120
9/12/2025, 3:02:24 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
I get everybody’s upset but this is standard journalistic practice. I said “suspected.” I deleted the mother’s name and cropped out his brothers. Elsewhere on X she has been named. I suspect the media will name both parents. And yes, to stress, he is innocent until proven guilty.
jgillis2004
@jgillis2004
·
129d
@shellenberger Isn't it a bit early to destroy this person's life? If he did - go to it, destroy away, he would deserve it! But are we there yet?
PS, saying "alleged" or "suspected" is meaningless with this amount of coverage; it gets tuned out.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
The mother appears to have taken each of her sons to dinner, separately, at the start of every school year. Lots of evidence these were loving parents raising their children in an intact family.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
A lot of people are speculating about his parents’ politics. I see no evidence they were politically active at all from their social media. Not a single political post over 13 year period. A lot of photos of the family smiling and having a good time on vacation.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
Calm down folks. I’m reporting not opining. Not posting a photo of a suspected sniper with a machine gun would be journalistic malpractice.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
129d
Clearly loved by his mother. Parents took family on vacations to Mexico and St. Thomas. Has two younger brothers. Mother repeatedly says he is smart. Pictures of normal middle class life in America.

The statement and conversation involve a serious public issue, discussing a suspect in a high-profile case. The discourse touches on the suspect's political activity and family background, raising concerns about privacy and the presumption of innocence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm the suspect's reputation by discussing political activity without clear evidence. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation may violate privacy by sharing personal family details and images, potentially impacting the dignity of those involved. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The discourse lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on speculation and personal details, which could lead to personal attacks. [-1]