Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47

Score 113

@daledwayer No. University approved curriculum has a place, of course. But what we’re talking about here is GOVERNMENT app approved curriculum, and I find that appalling.

9/13/2025, 12:28:02 AM

In reply to:

daledwayer

@daledwayer

@marwilliamson Are you saying professors should not follow university approved curriculum and teach whatever they want because that's free speech?

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

She wasn’t discussing gender identity in an elementary school; she was discussing it as part of a literature class at a public university! If we’re at a point where government gets to tell professors what they can & can’t discuss, we’re no longer living in a free society.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the role of government in regulating university curricula, touching on issues of academic freedom and free speech. The tone is critical of government intervention in educational content, suggesting it is appalling.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on expressing a critical opinion about government involvement in education. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in a dialogue by responding to a previous comment, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating against government control over academic content, using the platform to discuss societal issues. [+2]