Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving academic freedom, government intervention, and allegations of antisemitism. It suggests a controversial action by UC Berkeley, likening it to the McCarthy era, which implies a negative view of the situation.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially misrepresenting the situation or inciting fear among those involved. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It raises concerns about privacy and dignity by mentioning the sharing of names with the government. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses charged language like 'McCarthy era.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using a historical analogy that may polarize opinions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a perceived injustice, which can be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.