Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47

Score 118

@MEHerlihy @HenMazzig Is that how you would have felt as an American (if you are American)? I loved my country, I just hated what Bush was doing. I should not have been made to feel my national identify was annihilated because of his actions.

9/14/2025, 9:49:58 PM

In reply to:

Mark E. Herlihy

@MEHerlihy

@marwilliamson @HenMazzig Then let those singers disassociate from their government and compete under a neutral flag. It’s not about the singers.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

@HenMazzig A million Iraqis died when the USA invaded Iraq, plus we invaded under false pretenses. Not one American artist was forced out of competition, not one American business was punished.
Israeli singers are not responsible for the actions of the Netanyahu govt, in fact hundreds

Hen Mazzig

@HenMazzig

BREAKING: Eurovision organizers are reportedly offering Israel two options to end the participation crisis:

🇮🇱 Temporary withdrawal from the contest for one year “to avoid humiliating removal by European countries”

🏳 Participation under a neutral flag

The proposal comes

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing national identity and the impact of government actions on individuals. It reflects on personal feelings towards one's country despite disagreeing with its leadership, drawing a parallel between American and Israeli contexts.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm and expresses a personal perspective on national identity. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on personal feelings rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by sharing a personal experience that may resonate with others in similar situations. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
It engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a complex issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]