In reply to:
Cathy Russell
@Veritama
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing how to cultivate peace and the implications of labeling others with extreme comparisons. It challenges the idea of calling someone 'Hitler' and questions the behavior that might warrant such a label.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by invoking a highly charged historical figure, which may escalate tensions rather than promote peace. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the respectful discourse by suggesting a comparison to Hitler, which can be seen as disrespectful and inflammatory. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on a divisive comparison rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and may be seen as a personal attack rather than a dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.