Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
58d
The statement is a critical response to a news report about a military offensive in Gaza City. It expresses strong opposition to the actions described, using charged language to convey urgency and moral concern.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be interpreted as accusatory.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for displaced Palestinians, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a humanitarian issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a public issue, but the use of charged language requires careful consideration to ensure responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.