In reply to:
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
122d
Impure Hoonter 🇺🇸 â˜âƒ
@Bl00dOld
·
122d
The statement by @ggreenwald addresses the issue of state intervention in media and the potential threat to free speech, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is critical of state actions that may infringe on media freedom, and the intent is to highlight the importance of maintaining a separation between state power and media operations.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a critique of state actions, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of state actions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing state intervention in media, using the platform responsibly to discuss public concerns. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.