In reply to:
Half Jew Stannis
@stanweinberg1
·
52d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
52d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of suppression of dissent and the broader implications for free speech, suggesting that it transcends partisan lines.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies a defense against perceived suppression, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement calls for unity and opposition to suppression, which can be seen as a form of constructive dialogue, though it lacks specific engagement with opposing views. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating against the suppression of dissent, using the platform to discuss a societal issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.