In reply to:
Tom Swiss, HMSH 🗸
@tom_swiss
·
51d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
51d
The statement questions the President's implication that 'left wing lunatics' were responsible for a murder, highlighting the lack of evidence to support such a claim. It engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of political rhetoric and its potential consequences.
- The statement does not directly harm others but questions a potentially harmful implication made by the President.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in hate speech or harassment, but rather critiques a public figure's statement.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the validity of a claim made without evidence, encouraging a more evidence-based discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the President's statement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.