In reply to:
DroppinGems
@RealDroppinGems
·
51d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing President Trump's comments on revoking broadcast licenses, which is a public issue related to free speech and media regulation. The tone of the statement '@RealDroppinGems 100 per cent' is one of agreement with a previous critical comment about the administration's goals.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a critical view of the administration's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a simple agreement with a critical stance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely agrees with a previous comment without further discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly supports the principle of free speech by agreeing with a critique of actions perceived as threatening to media freedom. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.