In reply to:
Mike
@Mike4Liberty
·
51d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
51d
The statement by @Mike4Liberty is a dismissive response to a previous comment that accuses a political party of extreme actions. The tone is sarcastic and dismissive, suggesting that the previous comment lacks truth but acknowledges the right to express it.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the original commenter by dismissing their viewpoint without engagement. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the previous comment without addressing its content or providing counterarguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity by dismissing rather than engaging with the content of the discussion. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.