Michael Schellenberger

Rank 42 of 47

Score -120

Reposted by Michael Shellenberger

You are a liberal. You're concerned that the government has stifled a man's speech over misinformation. Tomorrow you will wake up and buy your morning coffee, but your card gets declined. Bank of America says that you violated terms and conditions. There's a grainy photograph of

9/18/2025, 6:52:06 PM

The statement presents a hypothetical scenario that critiques potential overreach by financial institutions in response to perceived violations of terms and conditions, possibly related to free speech issues. It suggests a concern about the implications of such actions on individual freedoms and privacy, which are public issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it implies a scenario where harm could occur through institutional actions.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and dignity by not targeting specific individuals, but it raises concerns about privacy violations by institutions.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather presents a hypothetical scenario to provoke thought. [-1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement touches on free speech concerns, suggesting a critique of potential overreach by institutions, which aligns with upholding free speech principles. [+1]