-4
In reply to:
HIS EXCELLENCY
@RAREPALACE
·
47d
The statement engages in public discourse by commenting on a policy issue related to press freedom and government transparency. The image and the reply suggest a comparison between the U.S. and authoritarian regimes, implying criticism of the Pentagon's policy.
- The statement uses sarcasm to criticize the policy, which could be seen as harmful by trivializing serious issues. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment but uses an image that could be considered disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses mockery rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting instead for sarcasm and ridicule. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.