In reply to:
Mike Lee
@BasedMikeLee
·
92d
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
·
93d
The statement and replies engage in public discourse by addressing a political figure's comments about the United States. The tone is dismissive and suggests that the individual should leave the country if dissatisfied, which can be seen as undermining respectful dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the individual's perspective and suggests they leave the country. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the individual, engaging in a form of cyberbullying by suggesting they should be sent back to another country. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for a personal attack rather than addressing the content of the individual's statement. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.