In reply to:
The statement is accusatory and uses charged language, suggesting that Spanberger is avoiding accountability by shifting blame. It engages in a public debate about gender and sports policies, which is a contentious societal issue.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses Spanberger of shameful behavior without providing evidence. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Spanberger, as it uses derogatory language and implies deceit. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than addressing the policy issue substantively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.