In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
The statement is a strong critique of perceived censorship by the EU and a call for action to protect free speech, particularly in relation to trade deals and the First Amendment. It reflects concerns about international influence on American rights and freedoms.
- The statement aims to protect free speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes specific individuals and entities, which could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of free speech issues, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of EU leaders, which could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.