Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about censorship, free speech, and international relations, particularly focusing on the EU's influence on American free speech rights. It reflects a critical stance towards perceived censorship efforts by both the EU and the Biden administration, emphasizing the importance of the First Amendment.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm from censorship, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of public criticism that borders on cyberbullying or harassment, depending on interpretation. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of free speech issues but does so in a confrontational manner, which may not foster empathy or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the EU and the Biden administration, which could be seen as constructive but lacks a dialogical approach, potentially violating the principle of avoiding personal attacks. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on censorship, aiming for societal betterment by advocating for free speech. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   It upholds free speech principles by advocating against censorship, aligning with responsible platform use. [+1]