In reply to:
Heidi
@2024Shitshow
·
9h
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10h
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing political and ideological conflicts, particularly focusing on perceptions of liberalism and conservatism. The tone is critical and somewhat provocative, using terms like 'lecture porn' and 'vulgar art of liberal narcissism' to describe certain behaviors. The conversation critiques perceived misinformation and ideological biases, which can contribute to polarization.
- The statement uses provocative language that may contribute to divisiveness rather than understanding, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the dignity of those it critiques. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote empathy or compassion, focusing instead on criticism and labeling. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be perceived as personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.