Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -88
9/24/2025, 3:55:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Rural Revival
@pilgrimboy14
路
20h
@shellenberger Your explanation here is so good.

"The core left wing view today is that progressives are good and conservatives are bad because progressives are more compassionate and more rational....Christian morality is far more complex, resting upon thousands of years or philosophical and
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
20h
The idea that our rights are natural is Christian Nationalist misinformation, say the media and Democrats. But it's not. It's right there in the Declaration of Independence. Behind the Left's dehumanization of conservatives is an ignorant denial of America's spiritual foundation.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
1d
Charlie Kirk's memorial was a bastion of Nazism and hate, said the Left. It wasn't. Erika Kirk elevated the event with her forgiveness. One reason for the Left's antipathy toward Kirk is because it is captured by a radical ideology that is fundamentally anti-Christian.

The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing political and ideological differences between progressives and conservatives, focusing on perceptions of morality and the role of Christianity in American values.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement critiques the left's view of conservatives, which could be seen as harmful by reinforcing divisive stereotypes.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves criticism of political ideologies but does not engage in direct personal attacks, maintaining a level of respect.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by discussing the complexity of Christian morality, though it may not foster empathy due to its critical tone.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue engages in criticism of opposing views but could be seen as lacking constructive engagement due to its accusatory nature.聽[-1]