Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 57
9/26/2025, 4:19:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Stine
@Michael84768518
·
25d
@marwilliamson Thank you for responding.
The point I am trying to make is that ICE does a lot of good. By arresting those people. So you have. To admit ICE does good things too.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
@Michael84768518 Of course, there are criminal offenders in every group of people. That’s not the basis for the criticism of the raids. The problem is how many people being picked up do not represent anything near criminal stature, and their treatment in the detention camps is often inhumane
Michael Stine
@Michael84768518
·
25d
@marwilliamson https://www.youtube.com/shorts/H…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
People who know next to nothing about how immigration law work in this country are refusing to see the legal and moral criminality of the ICE raids. 3/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
This “Well they should have come here legally!” mantra needs to be called out for the bullshit that it is. 2/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
25d
These ICE raids are perpetrating mass cruelty - terrorizing men, women, and children who have done nothing to deserve it. 1/

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of immigration policies on the economy and society, and critiques the handling of immigration reform by Congress. It responds to a conversation about the role of ICE and the treatment of immigrants, contributing to a broader debate on immigration policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement critiques the harm caused by current immigration policies, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the economic and social damage caused by current policies, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by questioning another user's perspective, but it could be more constructive by avoiding a potentially accusatory tone.
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for policy change, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate on immigration policy. [+1]