The statement by Kamala Harris, as reported, constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the indictment of James Comey and its implications for the Department of Justice. The tone is one of outrage and disbelief, reflecting a critical stance on the actions of the Justice Department under the Trump administration.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses strong disapproval of a public action, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it uses strong language to express a political opinion.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on expressing outrage. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but criticizes a public action and institution.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses Harris's influence to highlight concerns about the justice system, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by holding public institutions accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by expressing a political opinion and uses the platform to address a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.