Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of funding for digital IDs and its potential political impact. It expresses a negative view on the funding of the Tony Blair Institute by Oracle's Larry Ellison, suggesting a connection to digital IDs and implying negative consequences.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests harm by implying negative consequences of digital IDs without providing evidence, potentially spreading fear or misinformation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but could be seen as undermining the dignity of those involved by implying manipulation or wrongdoing. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on negative implications without exploring potential benefits or alternative perspectives. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making assertions without supporting evidence or inviting discussion. [-1]