Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about digital ID systems and their implications for privacy and surveillance. It frames the issue as non-partisan, appealing to 'freedom lovers' across the political spectrum to oppose what it terms 'digital totalitarianism.'
- The statement aims to raise awareness about potential harms of digital ID systems, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by opposing surveillance, but the language used ('digital totalitarianism') could be seen as inflammatory, potentially undermining respectful discourse. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The call for unity across political lines promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on the issue, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.