In reply to:
Everintrigued
@EverIntrigued
·
107d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
107d
The statement and conversation involve public discourse about digital ID systems and their implications for privacy and surveillance. The tone is critical and cautionary, expressing concern over potential government overreach and loss of privacy.
- The statement aims to raise awareness about potential harm from digital ID systems, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects privacy by advocating against surveillance, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging public awareness and action against perceived threats to privacy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation engages in constructive criticism of government actions, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.