In reply to:
Alex Jones
@RealAlexJones
·
9d
Liberty Memes
@Liberty_Memes
·
10d
The statement is part of a conversation involving public figures and addresses issues related to free speech and online platform policies. It references a request to reinstate individuals on YouTube, which is a public issue concerning platform regulation and freedom of expression.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that could influence public perception.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but is part of a contentious dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to discuss platform policies, which can impact societal norms. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement engages in discourse about free speech, aligning with the principle of using the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.