In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
106d
The statement critiques the push for digital IDs, suggesting ulterior motives such as financial gain and behavioral control. It challenges the reasons given by proponents, like stopping illegal migration and increasing efficiency, arguing these do not necessitate digital IDs. The tone is skeptical and cautionary, aiming to provoke critical thinking about the implications of digital IDs.
- The statement aims to prevent potential harm by questioning the motives behind digital IDs, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by highlighting concerns about data centralization and control, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging scrutiny of digital ID initiatives, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the motives and implications of digital IDs, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.