Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 57
9/28/2025, 4:21:33 AM
X
In reply to:
❤️ 🕊️ 🌈 🌎 bebeballena
@bebeballena
·
23d
@gbmillion @arealmermaid2 @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @emilmoller4 Why do you speak like a Zionist propagandist then? Why do you see this conflict only through that lens, seemingly incapable of recognizing Israel's shortcomings and wrongdoings as it pertains their historical treatment of Palestinians?
Gregory Barton - Foreswearer of thin potations
@gbmillion
·
23d
@arealmermaid2 @bebeballena @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @emilmoller4 I already told you I'm not a Zionist. Apparently reading is not your strong point. One wonders why you waste your time in a reading dependent environment. Wouldn't you spend your time better by knitting and watching television? And no. I'm not a 'Paid propagandist', but I'm https://x.com/gbmillion/status/1…
Theresa Sanders
@arealmermaid2
·
23d
@gbmillion @bebeballena @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @emilmoller4 Hilarious & incorrect! Are you a Zionist or a PAID Propagandist?
Gregory Barton - Foreswearer of thin potations
@gbmillion
·
23d
@arealmermaid2 @bebeballena @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @emilmoller4 Maybe because 'this Gregory person' is the only clued person around here when it comes to law. Maybe, unlike you, they are curious, despite their bigotry and hatred of Israel, to find out what someone who actually knows something on the subject actually thinks, rather than
Theresa Sanders
@arealmermaid2
·
23d
@gbmillion @bebeballena @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @emilmoller4 Why are you all engaging with this Gregory person, who is either a Zionist propagandist or totally clueless?
Gregory Barton - Foreswearer of thin potations
@gbmillion
·
23d
@bebeballena @arnau1700 @marwilliamson @HenMazzig @arealmermaid2 @emilmoller4 You have already pooh-poohed the law. Attempting to misrepresent it when it suits you is hypocritical and not at all persuasive.

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the ongoing and complex issue of the Israel-Palestine conflict, a significant public concern. The statement itself is a response to a conversation about perceived biases in discussing this conflict. The tone is defensive, and the intent seems to be to clarify a position or refute an accusation. The linked content suggests a call for a ceasefire, aligning with a broader political stance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the surrounding conversation includes accusatory and dismissive language, which could be seen as harmful.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself respects privacy and dignity, but the conversation it is part of includes personal attacks and dismissive language, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily defensive.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a conversation that includes personal attacks and dismissive language, which violates the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement engages in public discourse on a significant issue, but the surrounding conversation includes dismissive and accusatory language, which could undermine responsible use of the platform. [-1]