In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
105d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
106d
The statement expresses a strong opposition to digital IDs, suggesting a conspiracy by 'deep state' actors to implement them without public consent. It uses alarmist language to warn about the potential negative impacts of digital IDs.
- The statement uses charged language that could incite fear, potentially causing harm by spreading panic or misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It implies a conspiracy without evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the policy-making process. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on alarmist rhetoric. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using ad hominem attacks against 'deep state' actors. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.