The statement reflects on the paradox of widespread agreement on an issue that remains controversial to discuss. It suggests a disconnect between public opinion and public discourse, hinting at societal or media dynamics that may suppress certain viewpoints.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a critique of societal or media dynamics that may suppress certain viewpoints.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by highlighting a paradox in public discourse, encouraging reflection on why some topics remain controversial despite broad agreement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a broader societal issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses the platform to question societal norms, potentially encouraging more open dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.